?

Log in

Doctor Who Companion typology - Office of Naval Contemplation

Jul. 30th, 2012

11:46 am - Doctor Who Companion typology

Previous Entry Share Next Entry

Comments:

[User Picture]
From:britgeekgrrl
Date:July 30th, 2012 09:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The companions exist for two purposes - someone to explain the plot to, and someone to put into danger in order to move the plot forward. Beyond that, I've always been happy to let 'em all be themselves.

That said... ;)

Despite the actress's dreadful skills, I'd break out the "Zoe" type as a bucket all by itself. Adric and (to a lesser degree, Turlough) would land right in it, imho.

Totally agree that Jack's a Jamie-Ian, though. ;)

I salute your fortitude in watching the very early era of the show. I've seen bits and bobs and I'm afraid a lot of it was wasted on me. With a couple of exceptions, things don't really pick up for me and that show until Pertwee comes on to the scene. Even more so with the introduction of The Master. ;)

Edited at 2012-07-30 09:42 pm (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:maniakes
Date:July 30th, 2012 10:51 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The connection in my mind between the Zoe role and the Susan role is that the original Susan had some very Zoe-like moments, particularly in The Unearthly Child and The Sensorites. From what I gather, Carol Anne Ford envisioned the character as much more of what would become the Zoe archetype, emphasizing the "unearthly" side of Susan's nature, whereas the writers mostly preferred to use her in the Vicki-like role, emphasizing the "child" side of her nature (probably partly because, as you say, they need someone to get into danger and they need someone to explain things to), and this conflict was the main reason CAF left the show. Looking at the early stories in hindsight, especially with what's now been established about what Time Lords are, I pretty firmly favor CAF's side.

This typology actually started out with the Vicki-to-Susan transition, where Vicki was pretty transparently a drop-in replacement for Susan in her usual role (minus most of the flashes of Zoe/Romana-like awesomeness). It became a running joke for us to refer to Vicki as "New Susan". Then when Ian and Barbara left and Stephen joined, the transition was a bit better-executed, but Stephen was still a pretty obvious replacement for Ian's plot role.

The seeds of the idea probably came from some thoughts and discussions I'd had about the new series through a bit after Rose left, about how (up to that point) the "action hero" companions (what became the idea of the Ian archetype) were absent except for two or three appearances by Captain Jack, while in the classic series they'd been a major staple for much of the show's run.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:maniakes
Date:July 30th, 2012 11:00 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The early Hartnells were indeed pretty rough going (with a few flashes of brilliance, like "The Sensorites"), interesting more for historical interest than for its own merits, but the show seems to be really finding its feet in the Troughton era. I can definitely see the roots of the show's style in the Pertwee and Tom Baker eras in the Troughton stories I've seen so far. It's also, looked at in a different way, pretty strongly reminiscent of the Matt Smith era -- I've read part of an interview where Smith identified Troughton as a major influence on his portrayal of the Doctor, and I can definitely see that.

From the historical interest perspective, I really mourn the loss of all the early Troughton stories. In particular, there's a huge difference in style between Hartnell's Doctor and Troughton's, as well as in the overall feel of the show, and I would have liked to have been able to watch that transition happen.

Totally agreed about the Master's arrival, though. I'm a huge fan of that character, especially in the original Roger Delgado incarnation, and I break with conventional wisdom by identifying the Master rather than the Dalek's as the Doctor's best and most important recurring adversary.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:britgeekgrrl
Date:July 30th, 2012 11:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I really mourn the loss of all the early Troughton stories.

Preaching to the choir, my friend. Erasing master tapes in the name of saving money wasn't one of the BBC's most brilliant moments, no. But they couldn't know they had a cult hit in the making. ;)

Oh, I agree with you re: The Master. I mean, I love the Daleks and all, but an alien conqueror of the universe that couldn't climb stairs until 1988? Pssht.

I'll have to dig up the essay I saw somewhere that posited (not without merit) that all of Delgado!Master's schemes were grandiose attempts to get the Doctor to pay attention to him, dammit. ;)

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]
From:maniakes
Date:July 31st, 2012 07:24 am (UTC)
(Link)
One of my few big complaints about the new serieses is that they've reinterpretted Daleks as *individually* unstoppable killing machines. In my mind, that was never what made Daleks scary. What made them scary was that collectively, they're relentless. Sure, you can kill one Dalek. You can kill a thousand Daleks. And they'll just keep coming. Well, right up until they have to climb a staircase. Then they're stuck until the camera cuts away and the Dalek somehow finds a way up off-camera.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)